Skip to content

Advancement in sight: Road tolls could be imminent

Various transportation and infrastructure organizations have reached a consensus on the idea of implementing a road-user charge, but they remain divided on the timing, the consumer base, and whether diesel and gasoline vehicle drivers should bear higher fees.

Progressing forward: Road tolls could be nearer than anticipated
Progressing forward: Road tolls could be nearer than anticipated

Advancement in sight: Road tolls could be imminent

Australia Debates Implementing Road-User Charge for Electric Vehicles

The ongoing debate in Australia centres around the potential introduction of a road-user charge (RUC) for electric vehicles (EVs) as fuel excise revenues decline due to the rising adoption of EVs. This shift has significant implications for transportation taxes and infrastructure funding.

Rationale for RUC

Infrastructure advocates argue that a distance-based charge on EVs is needed to ensure sustainable funding for roads and charging infrastructure, given Australia's growing population and economy. The reason being, EVs do not consume petrol, resulting in a shrinking fuel excise revenue, traditionally used to fund road maintenance.

Proposed Models

A New South Wales-backed proposal suggests charging EVs approximately 2.874 cents per kilometre, with plug-in hybrids paying slightly less, indexed to inflation. This would replace current fuel excise revenues and ensure EV users contribute fairly to road costs.

Concerns and Opposition

EV industry groups and fleet managers warn that imposing RUC too early or at too high a rate could stall Australia's transition to clean transport. They call for charging mechanisms to be introduced only after EVs reach a substantial market share (e.g., 30% of new sales). Additional charges on hybrids risk double taxation since those vehicles still pay fuel excise.

Fairness and Scope

Some stakeholders, such as the Australian Electric Vehicle Association, advocate for a universal road-user charge applying to all vehicles based on mass and distance traveled, replacing fuel excise entirely. This would create a fairer system where all drivers pay proportionally to road impact, rather than singling out EV owners.

Practical Challenges

Issues include how to measure distance traveled (via odometer checks or tracking devices), whether off-road driving is included, and ensuring the system is administratively efficient without duplicating existing vehicle registration fees. There is skepticism around whether governments will efficiently spend the additional tax revenues.

Key Players

Treasurer Jim Chalmers has signaled his support for future changes regarding the road-user charge, and the government will discuss the issue at the Economic Reform Roundtable from Tuesday. Groups attending the roundtable on the issue last Monday widely agreed the current system for charging motorists was "unfair, unsustainable and inefficient."

Mr. Gaur, on the other hand, states that EV drivers do pay tax, with fees including registration, stamp duty, luxury car and fringe benefits taxes, and taxes on electricity. However, he supports a universal and emissions-intensity focused road-user charge for light vehicles only when electric car adoption reaches 30%.

Infrastructure Partnerships Australia chief executive Adrian Dwyer says urgent changes are needed to address Australia's dwindling tax revenue for roads. Polestar Australia managing director Scott Maynard argues against making EV drivers pay for all lost tax revenue.

The Australian Automobile Association reported record EV sales, with Australians purchasing over 29,000 electric vehicles in the three months to June, representing 9% of all car sales. Several state governments, including NSW, Tasmania, South Australia, and Western Australia, have plans to introduce a road-user charge for electric and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles from 2027.

The average cost of the suggested road-user charge per year would be approximately $380 to $400. The legality of state-based charges is in question after the High Court found Victoria's Zero and Low Emission Vehicles charge unconstitutional in October 2023. The federal government's productivity roundtable is debating the introduction of a road-user charge for electric vehicles.

In summary, the debate reflects a shift from fuel excise taxes to usage-based road charging to maintain infrastructure funding as EV uptake grows. How and when RUC is implemented will affect EV adoption rates, the fairness of transport taxation, and the financing of Australia’s future road network and electrified transport infrastructure.

  1. The implementation of a road-user charge (RUC) for electric vehicles (EVs) is being debated in Australia, with infrastructure advocates arguing that it is necessary to ensure sustainable funding for roads and charging infrastructure as the economy grows and fuel excise revenues decline due to the rising adoption of EVs.
  2. EV industry groups and fleet managers have expressed concerns that imposing RUC too early or at too high a rate could stall Australia's transition to clean transport, while some stakeholders, such as the Australian Electric Vehicle Association, advocate for a universal road-user charge applying to all vehicles based on mass and distance traveled, replacing fuel excise entirely.

Read also:

    Latest