Skip to content

Court delivers ruling in initial hearing

Court Rules in Anden-Bauer vs. RWE Case

Hamm's Appellate Court to Unveil Decision on 'Climate Case' Between Peruvian Farmer Saul Luciano...
Hamm's Appellate Court to Unveil Decision on 'Climate Case' Between Peruvian Farmer Saul Luciano Lliuya and Energy Company RWE Today

RWE vs Anden-Bauer: Court Delivers Judgment - Court delivers ruling in initial hearing

RWE Climate Lawsuit Verdict Delivered by German Court

The Higher Regional Court of Hamm in Germany has rendered its decision in the ongoing lawsuit filed by Peruvian farmer Saúl Luciano Lliuya against energy giant RWE. The farmer, seeking financial contribution for protective measures against a potential flood wave from the Palcacocha glacier lake, had asserted that RWE bears a share of the responsibility due to its greenhouse gas emissions.

Lliuya's lawsuit, backed by the Future Sustainability Foundation and environmental organization Germanwatch, was met with a legal challenge by RWE. The energy corporation considered the lawsuit inadmissible. In a hearing mid-March, two expert witnesses presented their findings, stating that Lliuya's property was not at serious risk of flooding or a mudslide in the next 30 years. They estimated the probability of realistic flooding scenarios at one percent.

However, lawyers and experts for Lliuya disputed the witnesses’ findings, claiming they underestimated the risk. Nevertheless, a motion for recusal against one of the expert witnesses was rejected, and the court postponed the initial decision date from April 14 to May 28 to review the motion.

Upon making its decision, the court dismissed Lliuya's appeal. It found that there was no imminent danger to his property. The court-appointed experts had estimated the probability of flood risk to his property at only 1% over the next 30 years. This decision prevents the establishment of a legal precedent for holding individual companies accountable for global climate change under German law.

The ruling acknowledges the potential for major emitters to be held liable for climate risks. However, it also raised concerns about the unforeseeable consequences for Germany's industrial sector, as it could lead to claims against any German company for climate-related damages around the world.

Sources:[1] Climate Action Network[2] Climate Home News

  1. The verdict delivered by the German court on the RWE climate lawsuit highlights the potential for major EC countries' energy companies to be held liable for climate-related risks, raising concerns about potential implications for the European industry and its energy policy.
  2. The EC countries' energy sector faces uncertainty over the establishment of legal precedents, as this ruling prevents holding individual companies accountable for global climate change under German law, potentially leading to claims against any EC industry for climate-related damages worldwide.
  3. The energy policy of EC countries, often intertwined with environmental science, finance, and health-and-wellness, will need to consider the impact of such lawsuits on the industry, including the potential economic and mental health implications for companies targeted.
  4. The decision underscores the importance of comprehensive energy policy and science in addressing climate change, ensuring balanced protection for both climate-vulnerable communities and industries while promoting sustainable practices and well-being for all.

Read also:

    Latest