Skip to content

Guide on Purchasing an American Corporation

Buying an established American company is a strategic move for numerous foreign and domestic enterprises aiming to enter the U.S. market. Here are the main acquisition methods used by U.S. businesses:

Guide to Buying an American Corporation
Guide to Buying an American Corporation

Guide on Purchasing an American Corporation

Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are common strategies for businesses seeking growth in the dynamic business world. These transactions involve the consolidation of companies or assets, and understanding the nuances of each method is crucial for both buyers and sellers. This article will explore the key differences between stock purchase, asset purchase, and statutory merger when acquiring a U.S. company.

Stock Purchase

In a stock purchase, the buyer acquires shares of the target company, obtaining ownership of the entire entity, including all assets, liabilities, contracts, licenses, and obligations. The target company remains intact, just with new ownership. The buyer assumes all known and unknown liabilities, including contingent liabilities.

Tax consequences for stock purchases are significant. Sellers typically pay capital gains tax on the sale of stock, which often results in favorable treatment, such as long-term capital gains rates if held for more than a year. However, buyers do not get a stepped-up tax basis in the company’s assets, so depreciation deductions remain based on the historical cost to the seller. The purchase price is not tax-deductible for the buyer, and there is no double taxation at the corporate level since ownership interest changes but the entity does not.

Asset Purchase

An asset purchase involves the buyer buying selected tangible and intangible assets of the target company rather than shares. This may include property, equipment, intellectual property, contracts, etc. The buyer can pick and choose the assets, may exclude liabilities or unwanted assets, and may require third-party consents to transfer certain contracts or leases.

Tax consequences for asset purchases are different. Sellers may face a higher tax burden because asset sale proceeds may be taxed as ordinary income or capital gains depending on the asset type. Buyers, on the other hand, get a step-up in tax basis for the acquired assets to the purchase price, enabling higher future depreciation or amortization deductions. There is a potential for double taxation if the target is a C corporation—once at the corporate level on the asset gain, and again at the shareholder level on liquidation proceeds. However, the buyer may recover transaction costs via depreciation deductions.

Statutory Merger

A statutory merger involves the smaller (target) company being absorbed by the acquiring company, transferring all assets, liabilities, contracts, debts, and rights to the acquirer by law. The target company ceases to exist, and the acquirer continues as a single entity with all operations combined.

A statutory merger may qualify as a tax-free reorganization under IRS rules (IRC Section 368) if certain requirements, such as continuity of interest, business purpose, and continuity of business enterprise, are met. This means no immediate tax at the corporate or shareholder level. If the tax-free requirements are not met, the transaction may be treated as taxable with capital gains consequences. Tax-free mergers enable deferral of gain recognition for both parties.

Comparison Table

| Aspect | Stock Purchase | Asset Purchase | Statutory Merger | |----------------------|-----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------| | What is acquired | Shares/ownership of company | Selected company assets | All assets and liabilities (company absorbed) | | Legal Entity | Company remains as is | Target remains, but assets sold out | Target company ceases; merged into acquirer | | Liabilities | Buyer assumes all liabilities | Buyer can avoid unwanted liabilities | Buyer assumes all liabilities | | Buyer basis | No step-up in asset basis | Step-up in basis for assets | Step-up possible if tax-free reorg applies | | Seller tax | Capital gains tax on stock sale | Mixed ordinary income/capital gains tax | Generally tax-free if statutory merger qualifies | | Buyer deductions | No immediate asset depreciation benefit | Can depreciate/amortize stepped-up asset basis | Depreciation depends on basis post merger | | Tax complexity | Lower buyer post-acquisition flexibility | More complex due to asset transfers & consents | Complexity in meeting tax-free reorg criteria |

In conclusion, the choice between stock purchase, asset purchase, and statutory merger depends on various factors, including tax considerations, the nature of the target company, and the strategic objectives of the buyer. It is essential to consult with a tax advisor or legal expert to determine the most suitable approach for a specific M&A transaction.

[1] Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 368: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/368 [2] IRS Guide to Corporate Reorganizations: https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p544.pdf [3] Understanding Tax-Free Reorganizations: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/tax-free-reorganization.asp [4] Stock Purchase vs. Asset Purchase: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesfinancecouncil/2019/08/08/stock-purchase-vs-asset-purchase-what-you-need-to-know/?sh=68c7b87e6ca6 [5] Tax Consequences of a Statutory Merger: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/statutory-merger.asp

In the realm of mergers and acquisitions (M&A), understanding the tax implications is crucial when choosing between a stock purchase, an asset purchase, or a statutory merger. For instance, in a stock purchase, the buyer assumes all liabilities and does not get a step-up in tax basis for the company’s assets, unlike an asset purchase where the buyer can depreciate or amortize the stepped-up asset basis. Additionally, in a statutory merger, the target company ceases to exist, and the acquiring company continues as a single entity with all operations combined, which may qualify as a tax-free reorganization under IRS rules if certain requirements are met. Consulting with a tax advisor or legal expert is essential to determine the most suitable approach for a specific M&A transaction.

Read also:

    Latest